Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Fairmount Township

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1913No. 18,025PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Leavenworth district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued the township and township officers to recover damages alleged to have been caused by overflow on account of a culvert constructed with an insufficient passageway for water, and also prayed that the defendants be permanently enjoined from maintaining such culvert in its present defective condition. A demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and the defendants electing not to introduce any testimony the injunction was denied and the plaintiff appeals.

The question of damages is ruled by Fisher v. Township, 87 Kan.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Silver v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Young v. Commissioners of HighwaysIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bills v. BelknapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Fisher v. Delaware TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Engler v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Marts v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Klotz v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Scott v. Glenwood TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Moody v. WickershamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API