Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. Barr
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action is on a policy-of life insurance.
Under the pleadings and proof, the issue upon the trial was narrowed to one question of fact, viz. Was the first premium paid upon the policy prior to the death of the insured?
Appellant insists it was entitled to. the affirmative charge on the evidence. The recited consideration of the policy was the payment of the initial premium at the time of delivery and later premiums as stipulated.
The insured stipulated:
“The company shall not be liable until the application has been received, approved, the policy issued thereon by the company and de-" livered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Dowdell v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Massey v. PentecostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Satterfield v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Powell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Barnett v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Mallory v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.