Photocircuits Corp. v. Marathon Agents, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Both defendants move for an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(c) imposing sanctions against the plaintiff and/or counsel for the plaintiff on the grounds that the causes of action in the complaint were (1) brought for an improper purpose and (2) not supported by non-frivolous argument.
The basis for the defendants’ motion are as follow: (1) there is no federal subject matter *450jurisdiction for the causes of action in the complaint; (2) the complaint does not set forth any basis for federal court subject matter jurisdiction in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- George Hadges, William M. Kunstler v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole-Cnca, New York Branch v. Valcorp, Inc., Peter R. Sarasohn, Esq. And Mitchell B. Seidman, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Securities Industry Ass'n v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Bartles v. HinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Pino v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.