Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnes-Wallace v. Boy Scouts of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 2006No. 04-55732, 04-56167Published

1Dissent

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

I respectfully dissent from the portion of the order concluding that the plaintiffs have standing under Article III. Because the plaintiffs lack standing, the case should be dismissed. However, assuming that there is standing, I concur in the portions of the order certifying questions to the Supreme Court of California.

The reason that the plaintiffs lack standing to sue the City and the Boy Scouts is that their only claimed harm from the Boy Scouts’ religiosity is that it offends them. Neither they nor their sons have ever sought to join the Boy Scouts or use the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API