Legal Opinion

Hill v. Cleveland

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 10, 2005No. 2040570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard Hill and Clifford W. "Chip" Cleveland II own adjoining parcels of property. Cleveland purchased his parcel of property ("the Bell property") in September 2000 from the estate of James "Junior" Bell. At times since his purchase of the Bell property, Cleveland and his tenants have traveled across Hill's property along an access road referred to as "Bell Lane" to access the Bell property. However, when Cleveland prepared to sell the Bell property, Cleveland's realtor was told by Hill that the Bell Lane access road was privately owned and that Cleveland had no easement or other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Lee v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vulcan Lands, Inc. v. SurteesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. Vulcan Lands, Inc. v. SurteesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API