Legal Opinion

Lyons v. Kanter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1918No. 12185PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Second Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gem-mill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

James F. Lyons recovered a judgment in an action of the fourth class in the municipal court of Chicago against Harry L. Kanter and Norton E. Ruderman for a malicious prosecution. The defendants appealed to the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment and granted a certificate of importance and a further appeal to this court.

It is insisted that the judgment must be reversed because the plaintiff’s statement of claim does not state a cause of action. The statement shows that the defendants were engaged in the mercantile business and used the name “Empire Paper Company;” that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McElroy v. Catholic Press Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gillman v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Enberg v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ross v. InnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  5. McBean v. RitchieIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pease v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Burghardt v. RemiyacAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Howard v. FirmandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Ferrell v. LivingstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  5. Klonowski v. Crescent Paper Box Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API