Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Division of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1989No. 8922SC62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that petitioner wilfully refused to submit to the breathalyzer analysis. Petitioner contends that he was deprived of his statutory rights under G.S. 20-16.2 when he was written up as a refusal before the expiration of the 30-minute statutory time period. Petitioner further asserts that if he had been allowed to take the test when his father arrived, the test could have been administered within the statutory period.

General Statute 20-16.2 provides that any person charged with driving while…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Etheridge v. PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Etheridge v. PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. In re Suspension of the License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of VallenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rock v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. White v. TippettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. ShepleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API