Legal Opinion

Shirks Motor Express Corp. v. Messner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1953No. Appeals, Nos. 22 and 25PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

The appellants, Shirks Motor Express Corporation and Interstate Motor Freight System, Inc., filed sep*453arate bills in equity against tbe Secretary of Revenue and the Auditor General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to enjoin them from enforcing the Act of June 22, 1931, P. L. 694, as amended by the Act of December 27, 1951, P. L. 1761, 72 PS §2185 et seq., which imposes an excise tax on the gross receipts of common carriers by motor vehicle, on the ground that the Act, as amended, violates the Commerce Clause, the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Untermyer v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Safeway Trails, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Fawber v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API