Legal Opinion

Marzolf v. Hoover

District Court, D. Montana

Decided July 31, 1984No. CV-84-12-GFPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HATFIELD, District Judge.

Presently before the court are numerous motions filed by the defendants requesting the court to dismiss and strike certain claims advanced by the plaintiff against the defendants. Having considered the merits of the arguments advanced by the parties with respect to these various motions, the court is now prepared to rule.

Defendant Hoover’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Original Complaint

Hoover moved to dismiss Count II of the plaintiff’s complaint which attempted to plead a claim for the tort of bad faith against Hoover. Subsequent to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Star v. RabelloNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Foy v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fode v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kyriss v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1986
  3. Fode v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fode v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Oedewaldt v. JC PENNEY CO., INC.District Court, D. Montana · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API