Legal Opinion

Carothers v. Carothers

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 17, 2011No. SC 91160Published

1Opinion of the Court

337 S.W.3d 21 (2011)

Dennie L. CAROTHERS, Respondent,

v.

Pamela CAROTHERS, Appellant.

No. SC 91160.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

May 17, 2011.

James McConnell, Shelbina, for the Mother.

Danieal H. Miller, The Law Offices of Danieal H. Miller PC, Columbia, for the Father.

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

This appeal raises two questions:(1) When is a judgment of contempt final for purposes of appeal?(2) Must the record include waiver of the right to counsel when the defendant in contempt is unrepresented?

Pamela Carothers was found in contempt of court for failing to satisfy a support judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Crow and GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Hunt v. MorelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. City of St. Peters v. HodakMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Emmons v. EmmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API