Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Deggs

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1998No. 96-1137PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

When a party does not return answers to a request for admissions within thirty days, the matters in the request are deemed admitted against that party. Tex.R. Civ. P. 169. Here, the trial court directed a verdict against defendants Wal-Mart and Allen Smith based on Smith’s deemed admissions. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment against Wal-Mart but reversed and remanded the judgment against Smith because the deemed admissions were insufficient to support Smith’s personal liability. — S.W.2d —, 1996 WL 492571. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in not granting the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stelly v. PapaniaTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. North River Insurance Co. of New Jersey v. Greene, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

4Cited by52 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Southwest Country Enterprises, Inc. v. Lucky Lady Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Boulet v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API