Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Deggs
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
When a party does not return answers to a request for admissions within thirty days, the matters in the request are deemed admitted against that party. Tex.R. Civ. P. 169. Here, the trial court directed a verdict against defendants Wal-Mart and Allen Smith based on Smith’s deemed admissions. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment against Wal-Mart but reversed and remanded the judgment against Smith because the deemed admissions were insufficient to support Smith’s personal liability. — S.W.2d —, 1996 WL 492571. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in not granting the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Stelly v. PapaniaTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- North River Insurance Co. of New Jersey v. Greene, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
4Cited by52 opinions
- Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Southwest Country Enterprises, Inc. v. Lucky Lady Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Boulet v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.