Legal Opinion
Husted v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 11, 2015No. 71662-0-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, C.J.
¶1 This appeal arises from entry of summary judgment in an action for negligent supervision of an offender, Calvin Finley, by the Department of Corrections (DOC). Appellants contend the trial court erred in concluding that as a matter of law, DOC had no duty to control the offender once he absconded from supervision and a warrant was issued for his arrest. Finding no error, we affirm.1
*581 FACTS
¶2 On September 1, 2006, Calvin Finley was convicted of a violation of a domestic violence court order in Pierce County and sentenced to 15 months’ confinement and 9 to 18 months of community custody.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Fox v. CustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Ahmet Hopovac v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Ahmet Hopovac v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Husted v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Husted v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2015