Legal Opinion
Carpinteria Valley Farms, Ltd. v. County of Santa Barbara
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 2003No. 01-57218PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed June 25, 2003, and published at 334 F.3d 796, is amended as follows:
*8241. Page 798, second paragraph, end of the second sentence which concludes “the County”)’ — insert the following sentence:
He alleged that the County had pursued a “go tough on Nesbitt” policy which encompassed several distinct constitutional violations.
2. Page 798, second paragraph, clause that ends with “were not imposed on similarly situated property owners;” — insert after “owners;” a reference to footnote 1. Then, at the bottom of page 798, insert as footnote 1 the following:
1…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wendell Lyons Donald Tate Robert L. Claiborne Rosevelt Willson v. Gordon R. England, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carpinteria Valley Farms, Ltd. v. County of Santa BarbaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003