Knowlton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has served defendant with forty (40) requests for admissions of fact under Rule 36(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Defendant has made response to twenty-eight (28) of them. To the remaining twelve (12), objection has been lodged for various reasons. Tersely stated, the objections so made are that said requests do not call for admissions of fact, within the meaning of Rule 36(a), but call for conclusions, hearsay, medical and lay opinions and for matters not within the knowledge of defendant. Some requests are objected to because “the matters…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
- Kraus v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berrier v. BizerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- Johnstone v. CronlundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Demmert v. DemmertDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.