Legal Opinion
Hardin v. PDX, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 2014No. A137035PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIGGINS, J.
PDX, Inc., claims the trial court erred when it denied a motion to strike brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, and refused to dismiss a negligence and products liability action as a strategic lawsuit against public participation. Because plaintiff demonstrated a probability she may prevail on her claim, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Kathleen Hardin suffered complete blindness and permanent, severe and painful scarring after she began taking lamotrigine, the generic form of the medication Lamictal. According to her complaint, Hardin later learned that lamotrigine…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Amiodarone CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Andrew Whaley v. Oracle Health Government Services, Inc., et al.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
- In Re: Sears Holdings CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Jenni Rivera Enterprises v. Latin World Entertainment etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.