Legal Opinion

State v. Pidcock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. 10-85-09438; CA A40456Published

1Opinion of the Court

749 P.2d 597 (1988)

89 Or.App. 443

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Thomas Henry PIDCOCK, Appellant.

10-85-09438; CA A40456.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted February 20, 1987.

Resubmitted December 2, 1987.

Decided February 10, 1988.

Larry R. Roloff, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

David Schuman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Resubmitted in Banc December 2, 1987.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts…

Also in this document: Dissent · Buttler; Dissent · Warden.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. PurvisOregon Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API