Legal Opinion
United States v. Guthrie
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided January 13, 1993No. CR-92-168-AAMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL, NEW TRIAL, OR ARREST OF JUDGMENT
MeDONALD, District Judge.
Before the court for resolution without oral argument is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, or in the Alternative New Trial or Arrest of Judgment (Ct.Ree. 58). Defendant is represented by retained counsel Leslie Weatherhead. The United States is represented by Phillip Warren and James Sowers of the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. For the reasons stated more fully below, the court is denying defendant’s motion.
After trial to a jury in Spokane, Washington,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. A. Lanoy Alston, D.M.D., P.C. Ronald D. Walker Desert Valley Dental, Ltd. Richard B. Meyer Aaron L. ("Lanoy") AlstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. The Bensinger Company, United States of America v. The Hobart Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- United States v. KernellDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010