Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 6, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner by mandamus in this Court seeks to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys in good standing before the bar of this State, relying on State v. Kirk, 12 Fla. 278. At the time of State v. Kirk Sections 2554 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats, (now Sections 4172 et seq., Comp. Gen.' Laws of 1927) was not in force. The latter statute providing a more speedy and adequate remedy, the petition for mandamus is denied.
All concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis & Holmes Motor Freight Corp. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Curcie Bros. v. CaruthersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966