Curtis v. Reilly
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from GMoJcasaw District Court. — W. J. SpriNGEr, Judge. Suit in equity for the partition of real estate. A demurrer to the petition was overruled, and the defendants appeal. The material facts are stated in the opinion.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.
i. partition: necessary parties. The admitted facts in the case are that plaintiffs and defendants were formerly partners in the real estate business. The partnership was dissolved by mutual consent, February 1, 1918, its business settled and debts fully paid, leaving on hand ‘ ° an undistributed or undivided interest in real estate, which had been acquired as follows: During the existence of the partnership, the firm united with other parties in the joint purchase of four different tracts of land, which, for the sake of brevity, we will designate as Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4. The purchase of No. 1…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Walker v. Miller.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Shearer v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Kentucky Block Cannel Coal Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grisso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Norwood v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Bankers Trust Co. v. KneeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Wolkowitz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.