Legal Opinion

Kentucky Block Cannel Coal Co. v. Sewell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1918No. 3074PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Kentucky; Andrew M. J. Cochran, Judge. Suit in equity by J. W. Sewell, A. W. Sewell, and Hattie E. Sewell against the Kentucky Block Canuel Coal Company and others. Decree for complainants, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, hereinafter called plaintiffs, filed bill in equity to quiet their alleged title to the minerals (coal, oil, and gas) in a tract of land in Morgan county, Ky., lying on both sides of the Stone Coal or Prater fork of Caney creek. They base their claim of title upon a formal conveyance of such mineral rights, made in 1865 by John Sebastian to J. W. Sewell & Co., which was a partnership composed oí John W. Sewell and Harriet Sewell — father and mother, respectively, of plaintiffs, whose rights descended in equal shares to plaintiffs, their children and heirs at…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Riddle v. WhitehillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Johnson v. Van VelsorMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Godfrey v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Walker v. Miller.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Percifull v. PlattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Duncan v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Davison v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. McPherson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Schurman v. PegauNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API