Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Harried

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided December 30, 2009No. Civil Action 5:06cv160-DCB-JMRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Court.

This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry no. 145] filed by the defendants William Guy and Thomas Brock (“Guy and Brock”). Defendant Willie R. Harried (“Harried”) has also joined the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry no. 152]. 1 The factual and procedural history of this case is extensive. The Court has previously set forth the facts of this case in a prior order [docket entry no. 187] on August 6, 2009, which denied Guy and Brock’s first motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the Court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
  2. Thomas v. Rice (In re Rice)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015
  3. Divinity v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
  4. Roger Williams, et al. v. North Light Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API