Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 13, 1986No. 85-92-IIIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT, Judge.

The appellant, a practicing attorney, was convicted of obtaining personal property by false pretense and received a sentence of three years in the state penitentiary as a Range I, standard offender. His application for probation was granted and he was placed on probation for a period of five years and ordered to perform public service work.

Much aggrieved by his conviction, the appellant has presented eleven issues on appeal. Taken together, two of the issues challenge the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. Specifically, the appellant contends that the owner of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. HatchettTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. DykesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. State v. VasquesTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. KennedyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. State v. SummersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Vermilye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API