Legal Opinion
People v. Du Bont
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 1965No. Crim. 8836PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
— Appellant was by information charged in two counts, Count I: burglary (Pen. Code, § 459); Count II: receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496). He was found not guilty by the court on Count I and guilty on Count II. He appeals from the judgment.
The record shows that appellant had been a police officer for 11% years and was prior to and at the time of his arrest a licensed bail bondsman.
On this appeal appellant’s primary contention is that the evidence was insufficient to establish the requisite element of knowledge that the goods in his possession were stolen. The evidence on this point…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bernard v. Department of Motor Vehicles CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968