Legal Opinion

Orozco v. Franco (In re Franco)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 22, 2019No. CASE NO: 16-35105; ADVERSARY NO. 18-3004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

The principal purpose of the Bankruptcy Code is to grant a fresh start to the honest but unfortunate debtor-any purpose that violates the intent of the Bankruptcy statute is considered unworthy of bankruptcy protection and will be halted.1 Pending before this Court is Ricardo Orozco's ("Orozco " or "Plaintiff ") "Amended Complaint for Revocation of Discharge" ("Amended Complaint ") against Jose R. Franco, Jr. ("Franco " or "Defendant " or "Debtor "). In his Amended Complaint, Orozco alleges that because Franco's discharge was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. In the Matter of Daniel J. Yonikus and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YonikusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. First Texas Savings Ass'n v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Bowman v. Belt Valley Bank (In Re Bowman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gargula v. PooleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
  2. Hong Kong Development Corporation v. PhanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
  3. Smithyman v. CrawfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API