Legal Opinion

Markert v. Behm

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1986No. C6-86-923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal is taken from the trial court’s dismissal of appellants’ action challenging the paternity of respondent, who is the presumptive father of the child in question and who was also adjudicated the child’s father in a prior divorce proceeding. The trial court held that the doctrines of collateral estoppel, equitable estoppel, and res judicata barred appellant mother from challenging the previous adjudication of paternity, and that appellant putative father lacked standing to bring a paternity action. We affirm.

FACTS

Linda and Alan Markert were married on November…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Cook v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. A v. X, Y, AND ZWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Moore v. Com., Cabinet for Human Res.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Marriage of Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API