Markert v. Behm
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal is taken from the trial court’s dismissal of appellants’ action challenging the paternity of respondent, who is the presumptive father of the child in question and who was also adjudicated the child’s father in a prior divorce proceeding. The trial court held that the doctrines of collateral estoppel, equitable estoppel, and res judicata barred appellant mother from challenging the previous adjudication of paternity, and that appellant putative father lacked standing to bring a paternity action. We affirm.
FACTS
Linda and Alan Markert were married on November…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Cook v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- A v. X, Y, AND ZWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Moore v. Com., Cabinet for Human Res.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Marriage of Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.