Legal Opinion

City of Topeka v. Mayer

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 14, 1992No. 66,715PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, J.:

Gwendolyn M. Mayer appeals her conviction of violating Topeka City Ordinance § 8-45(a)(2) (1991), which prohibits a dog owner from permitting a dog to attack or bite any person upon the owner’s premises.

We affirm.

Tayha Fager, a mail carrier, delivered mail to the Mayer residence. As she was leaving the property, a German Shepherd dog ran from the garage and allegedly attacked and bit Fager.

Mayer was originally charged with allowing her dog to run at large and with permitting her dog to bite a person not upon the premises of the owner. The municipal court found her guilty on both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. State v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Hearn v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. City of Wichita v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Fairmont Foods Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steffes v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. State v. DerusseauCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  4. City of Wichita v. MarlettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API