Legal Opinion

Caskie v. R. M. Butler & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1987No. 8610IC967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff s sole assignment of error is that the Industrial Commission erred in concluding that her injury was not the result of a “specific traumatic incident” but developed gradually and was not, therefore, an accident within the coverage of the Workers’ Compensation Act for back injuries.

In 1983, G.S. 97-2(6) was amended to read as follows:

“Injury and personal injury” shall mean only injury by accident arising out of and in the course of the employment, .... With respect to back injuries, however, where the injury to the back arises out of and in the course of the employment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Searcy v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Mills v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Davis v. SummittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richards v. Town of ValdeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Ruffin v. Compass Group USACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Lettley v. Trash Removal ServiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Carter v. a Child's World Learning CenterNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011
  5. Fipps v. BABSON AND SMITH TRUCKINGCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API