Legal Opinion

Chaney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1988No. 53782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of forcible rape and forcible sodomy for sexually assaulting the victim while wielding a knife. He was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of 20 and 10 years. We affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. State v. Chaney, 663 S.W.2d 279 (Mo.App.1983).

While the facts of the case are detailed in the opinion from movant’s direct appeal, for purposes of reviewing this case, we believe certain facts should be set forth in this opinion. The victim…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Grippe v. MomtazeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCoo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Ludwig v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Stark v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Zonge v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API