Legal Opinion

Steven James v. Charles L. Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 2013No. 19-72880PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

In James v. Ryan (James II), 679 F.3d 780 (9th Cir.2012), we granted Steven James habeas corpus relief from his death sentence, holding that his trial counsel had provided ineffective assistance at the penalty phase. The United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded for us to consider whether Johnson v. Williams , — • U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1088, 185 L.Ed.2d 105 (2013), compels a different result. Ryan v. James, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1579, 185 L.Ed.2d 572 (2013). We conclude that it does not.

I. Background

A. State Proceedings

An Arizona jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Randall Amado v. Terri GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Tony Bennett v. Superintendent Graterford SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Ronald Taylor v. Matthew Cate, Secretary CdcrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Gregory Demetrulias v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Postelle v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API