Legal Opinion
Mueller v. William F. Wall Rope Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action by one Mueller, assignee of the Standard Rope & Twine Company of New Jersey, against the William F. Wall Rope Company.
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.
The contract on which the claim arose was made in the state of New York, and there is no allegation that the Standard Rope & Twine Company (a New Jersey corporation), the plaintiff’s assignor, had complied with section 15 of chapter 687 of the Laws of 1892, which provides as follows:
*256“Sec. 15. No foreign stock corporation, other than a moneyed corporation, shall do business in this state without having first procured from the secretary of state a certificate that it has complied with all the requirements of law to authorize it to do business in this state, and that the business of the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kinney v. Reid Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Lindheim v. SittNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Herzberg v. BoiesenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1897
- Mallon v. RothschildNew York Supreme Court · 1902