Legal Opinion

Mallon v. Rothschild

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1902Published

Motion to vacate an attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The plaintiff obtained; on the ground of non-residence of defendant, a writ of attachment. The defendant made a motion to set aside the attachment on the papers upon which it was obtained, claiming that it was not shown that defendant was a nonresident. The affidavit as to the nonresidence of defendant is made by the plaintiff,who swears that “the defendant is not a resident of this State, but resides at Ho. 37 Montcalm street east, in the city of Detroit, State of Michigan, as deponent is informed by Gerhard G. Jansen, whose affidavit is hereto annexed, showing that the said defendant is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. . JackNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Turtle v. TurtleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Hawkins v. PakasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Farquhar v. Wisconsin Condensed Milk Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API