Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Ramos

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 7, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WECKER, J.S.C.

This Court has determined, on its own motion, to allow the parties relief under R. 4:50-l(f) from one aspect of the Final Judgment entered. In a “friendly” proceeding for approval of the settlement of an infant’s claim, this Court denied approval of that portion of the proposed settlement that would have provided a contract for future payment of a lump sum at the infant’s 18th birthday. The decision is reported in Ramos v. Ramos, 219 N.J.Super. 679 (Law Div.1987).

On May 3, 1988, our Supreme Court adopted amended R. 4:44-3, effective immediately. 121 N.J.L.J. 1126 (June 2, 1988).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ramos v. RamosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eagan Ex Rel. Keith v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Gibraltar Casualty Co. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Gibraltar Casualty Co. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API