Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gibraltar Casualty Co. v. Walters

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1999No. 98-1182Published

1DissentLucero, Circuit Judge

Because my analysis of this case differs from that of my colleagues, and would lead to a different result, I respectfully dissent. My disagreement is on three points.

I

First, I would not so hastily dispose of the trial court’s conclusion that Colo.Rev. Stat. § 13-50.5-104(4) is the applicable statutory provision controlling the limitation period. Neither subsection (3) nor subsection (4) of the statute use the unqualified term “judgment,” but instead use the qualified language “judgment for the injury or wrongful death against the tort-feasor seeking contribution.” Finding no pertinent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. Alfred Lee Brown William Chase Brown Kendall Brown Edward Stonecipher Mary Stonecipher State of Oklahoma Department of Human Services/oklahoma Teaching Hospital, and Hooshmand Niroumand, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of David Niroumand, Nasim Niroumand and Nushin Niroumand, Minors Ehteran Radfar Mahmoud Radfar Khadijeh Samandizadeh, Allstate Insurance Company v. Alfred Lee Brown Kendall Brown, and William Chase Brown Hooshmand Niroumand, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of David Niroumand, Nasim Niroumand and Nushin Niroumand, Minors Ehteran Radfar Mahmoud Radfar Khadijeh Samandizadeh Edward Stonecipher Mary Stonecipher State of Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Deason v. LewisColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Stonehurst at Freehold v. TP. COMM, TP. FREEHOLDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Sturdivant v. General Brass & MacHine Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Marsh v. WarrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API