Legal Opinion
City of Bayonne v. Dougherty
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 20, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee Cubiam.
In Bayonne v. Dougherty, 59 N. J. Super. 288 (App. Div. 1960), the Appellate Division held that the Civil Service Commission had no authority to review the allegedly discriminatory denial of increments to certain employees in Bayonne’s Sewer Department. The employees never sought review of the Appellate Division’s judgment and we were advised at oral argument that they have since received their increments. The Civil Service Commission did not apply for certification of the Appellate Division’s judgment within the 20-day period prescribed in R.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of PfizerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- City of Bayonne v. DoughertyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Camden Lime Co. v. BorekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Stern v. GlassenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Cardinale Trucking Corp. v. Motor-Rail Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of the Reallocation of the Probation Officer AndNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Ass'n of Mun. Assessors of NJ v. Mullica Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOC. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- In re the Pemberton Township Municipal Utilities AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.