Legal Opinion

Camden Lime Co. v. Borek

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 7, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 N.J. Super. 174 (1960)

164 A.2d 361

CAMDEN LIME COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MICHAEL E. BOREK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 3, 1960.

Decided October 7, 1960.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and KILKENNY.

Mr. W. Louis Bossle argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph A. Maressa, attorney).

Mr. Charles A. Cohen argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Jacob L. Furer, attorney; Mr. Samuel P. Orlando, of counsel; Mr. Cohen, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendant appeals from a summary judgment entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. ApplegateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. State v. PetroliaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Hodgson v. ApplegateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. State v. NewmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Landy v. LesavoySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seltzer v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. City of Bayonne v. DoughertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. YOON H. BAE VS. ROMAN LEYFMAN (L-5274-15, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API