Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Wells

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 3, 1944No. 8 Div. 246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellee, W. R. Wells, sued appellants, Hoyt Wheeler, et al., in ejectment. Defendants, upon a showing 'that the issue was one of disputed boundary line between co-terminous landowners, had the cause removed to the equity court for the purpose of settling the boundary line.

In equity the issues were made up on bill by original defendants, as complainants, and original plaintiff, as respondent and cross-complainant. The cause being submitted for final decree on pleadings and proof, the court found and decreed the true boundary line as claimed by appellee, original plaintiff.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Ellenburg v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berger v. BhendArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. McNeil v. AttawayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McNeil v. AttawayArizona Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API