Legal Opinion

State v. Medina

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1987No. 20629PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Jerry Joe Medina appeals from a conviction of murder in the second degree. He contends that the trial court impermissibly interfered with his right to a jury trial when it gave the jury a modified version of the “dynamite” or “Allen ” charge. 1 He also argues that his trial counsel’s failure to object to the giving of the charge was so improper as to deny him the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

There is no need to discuss the circumstances of the crime with which defendant was charged. For purposes of this appeal, only the circumstances surrounding the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. MalmroseUtah Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API