Legal Opinion

Nicholl, Exr. v. Bergner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1945No. 1103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

This action was commenced in the Probate Court of Lorain county to construe the will of Prances Nicholl, deceased.

The single question in controversy related to .a latent' ambiguity in respect to the identity of one of the beneficiaries. A one-seventh part of the residuary estate was given to one “Edward Bergner.” The evidence disclosed two relatives who could be the natural objects of her bounty — one a brother named Edward G. Bergner, and the other a nephew named Edward C. Bergner. There is no doubt that she meant one or the other, and each claimed the share.

The trial court determined from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coulam v. DoullSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rospert v. Old Fort Mills, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Balduf, Exr. v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Weis v. WeisOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Sweeny v. PalusCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API