Legal Opinion

Dashaway Assn. v. Rogers

California Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1839No. 11838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Each of the two defendants demurred separately to the complaint. Both demurrers *212were sustained, and judgment rendered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

We think that the court erred in sustaining the demurrers. The facts alleged in the first count of the complaint are substantially these-: The defendant R. C. Rogers represented to plaintiff that he (R. C.) was the owner of a certain piece of land. Plaintiff, relying on his representation, and believing that he was acting for himself alone, entered into a written contract with him, by which he agreed to sell said land to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. MoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colquhoun v. PackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Milner v. PelhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In re SalmonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1906
  4. McManus v. PatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API