Legal Opinion

White v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 3

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.

The two petitioners, residents of the East Meadow School District and more particularly the area serviced by the Salisbury Elementary School (hereinafter referred to as the Salisbury area), instituted this proceeding on April 5, 1973 pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent, the East Meadow Board of Education, to provide funds in the proposed 1973-74 school budget for the continued operation of the Salisbury school. Two hundred and fourteen other residents of the Salisbury area have moved to be joined as plaintiffs herein, and their motion is treated as one for leave *172to intervene…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Le Tarte v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Arglo Painting Corp. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Board of Sup'rs of Halifax CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. County School Board of Spotsylvania County v. McConnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. CTY. SCH. BD. OF SPOTSYLVANIA v. McConnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Lunsford v. Fairfax County School BoardFairfax County Circuit Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API