Legal Opinion

Grucinski v. Tetlak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1953No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, 3.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued in equity to compel defendants, husband and wife, owners of adjoining property, to remove sand, stones and other obstructions which defendants had placed in a ten foot alleyway, created by deed of the original owner of both of their lots, and to cease and desist from interfering with plaintiffs’ free and unobstructed use of the same. The chancellor dismissed the bill on the ground that the easement had been extinguished by mutual abandonment. Plaintiffs’ exceptions were dismissed by the court en banc, and this appeal followed.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindeman v. LindseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. Mitchell v. BovardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Dulany v. BishoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Nauman v. KopfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hatcher v. ChesnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API