Legal Opinion · Dissent

M.D.C. v. K.D.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2009No. 1071625Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

The law of Alabama has always understood a termination of parental rights to be a termination of the parental relationship, or the parental status. In this regard, Alabama law has been, and is, no different than the law of other jurisdictions, particularly where a statute does not specifically state otherwise. “[T]he great majority of jurisdictions ... agree that judicial termination of parental rights severs the parent-child relationship to the extent that the parent no longer owes a duty to support the child.” State Dep’t of Human Servs. ex rel. Overstreet v. Overstreet, 78 P.3d 951, 954…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ex Parte BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Ex Parte BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Roe v. ConnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API