Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Neely
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1998No. 24011Published
1Opinion of the Court
528 S.E.2d 468 (1998)
207 W.Va. 21
LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant,
v.
Richard F. NEELY and Roger D. Hunter, Members of the West Virginia State Bar, Respondents.
No. 24011.
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
Submitted March 24, 1998.
Decided July 15, 1998.
Concurring Opinion of Justice Workman July 17, 1998.
Sherri D. Goodman, Esq., Chief Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorney for the Complainant.
David H. Burton, Esq., Burton & Kilgore, Princeton, West Virginia, Attorney for Neely.
Robert H. Davis, Jr., Esq., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Attorney for Hunter.
PER…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Lieving v. HadleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.