Jones v. United States

*532ON DEPENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

OPINION

SETO, Judge.

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for reconsideration, and plaintiff’s response thereto, for reconsideration of this court’s earlier order denying defendant’s and plaintiff’s cross-motions for summary judgment.1 In reaching its earlier decision, the court considered the issues of whether an Air Force Reserve Officer Screening Board (“ROSB”) included an “appropriate number” of reserve members as required by 10 U.S.C. § 266(a), and whether plaintiff’s claim was barred by laches. The court found that facts material…