Legal Opinion

Tu Hou Lam v. Lynch MacHinery Division of Lynch Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 14, 1988No. 87-1461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray

Plaintiff, Tu Hou Lam, appeals from a judgment for defendant, Lynch Machinery Division of Lynch Corporation (Lynch), in a personal injury action. She contends that the trial court erred in not allowing her to examine the potential biases of witnesses. Plaintiff also appeals from an order of the trial court denying her post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The record discloses that plaintiff, while working as an employee for Tootsie Roll Industries (TRI), was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gatto v. Walgreen Drug Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Casson v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. AliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. DiBenedetto v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Bachenski v. Mark Malnati, Flash Cab Company, and John HawkotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Batteast v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Carlson v. City Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. McGrath v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Banovz v. RantanenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API