Legal Opinion

Casson v. Nash

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1978No. 50311PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

This action arose as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by Lillian Cook, in which plaintiffs, Lillian Casson and Josephine Pustz, were passengers, and an automobile driven by defendant Gordon Nash. Casson and Pustz sought damages from Nash for their personal injuries allegedly caused by Nash’s negligence. Following a jury verdict in favor of Nash, the circuit court of Cook County entered judgment on the verdict. The appellate court, in a unanimous decision, reversed and remanded for a new trial. (54 Ill. App. 3d 783.) We granted Nash leave to appeal.

Nash contends that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Miller v. Pillsbury Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. American State Bank v. County of WoodfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Casson v. NashAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Avco Distributing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Gillespie v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cedric Spring & Associates, Inc. v. N.E.I. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API