Legal Opinion

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. Davis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2012No. 26448PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[If 1.] This is an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus or prohibition commenced by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (Tribe) against the Honorable Jeff W. Davis, Presiding Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit. 1 We dismiss the application for a writ.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] Three unattended Native American children, ages sixteen, twelve, and three, were taken into custody from their residence by the Rapid City Police Department in the early morning hours of July 6, 2012. Oldest child was found intoxicated and suffering from seizures. Oldest child was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. D.E.D. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re EstherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Marlene C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Mark VargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. In re H.T.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van HunnikDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
  5. Puffy's, LLC v. Dep't of HealthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API