Legal Opinion

Marsters v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1916No. 2654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. Suit by the United States against Elias Marsters and E. F. Lakin. Decree for the United States, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The Boise river is one of the streams of Idaho, the waters of which are used in part for the purpose of irriga*664tion in Ada and Canon counties of that state, and the United States is one of the appropriators, under an application filed by certain citizens and residents of the state with its state engineer for permit to divert and appropriate 5,200 cubic feet per second of the said waters for the irrigation of certain lands within the state, now known as the “Government Boise project.” The application having been approved by the state engineer and a permit granted to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Taylor v. HulettIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irrigation District, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Farmers' Co-operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irrigation District, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Stethem v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owen v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Board of Directors of Wilder Irrigation District v. JorgensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API