Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Directors of Wilder Irrigation District v. Jorgensen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1943No. 6972Published

1DissentGivens, J.

(Dissenting.) — Appellants, as members of respondent irrigation district, are the owners of water rights therein. While the record is not as specific as it might be, evidently their water rights were obtained either by them or their predecessors in interest originally from and under the United States Boise-Payette reclamation project . established February 13, 1906, and appellants were consenting land owners to the contract, Exhibit “B”, dated April 6, 1926, attached to appellants’ answer and cross-complaint. Prior to that time the lands now in the Wilder Irrigation District, so far as this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Sanitary District of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Florida v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API