Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Friedman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to cancel a notice of lis pendens.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

This is an application to cancel a notice of Lis pendens on the ground that the plaintiffs have unnecessarily neglected to proceed in these actions. The plaintiffs filed notes of issue and noticed the causes for trial, but the defendants did not serve any cross notices of trial. These causes appeared upon the day calendar of Special Term, Part III, on April 26, 1907, and at the request of the plaintiffs’ attorney they were set down for the day calendar for May tenth, but did not appear on the day calendar until May twenty-fourth, when the actions were dismissed on motion of the defendants’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leese v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Jarvis v. American Forcite Powder Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Brady v. MartinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milman v. DennistonNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Weisinger v. BerfondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API